Loren W. Crow, Météorologue consultante certifiée
Téléphone (303) 722-8665
or 756-3971
2422 South Downing Street
Denver, Colorado 80210
1er Avril 1968
| Home > Rapport Condon > Sommaire |
|---|
Ce qui suit est un résumé des conditions météo entourant les observations visuelles d'ovnis et des échos radar coincidants près de Washington (D.C.) et de Norfolk (Virginie) dans les nuits du 19 au 20 Juillet 1952, et 26 au 27 Juillet 1952.
Données radiosonde et de vent de -
- Washington, D.C., Norfolk (Virginie)
- Richmond (Virginie)
Observations météo de surface autours des heures des observations de -
- Aéroport National de Washington
- Bolling AFB
- Andrews AFB
- Norfolk (Virginie)
- Newport News (Virginie)
- Langley AFB
La situation météo générale durant les 2 nuits était chaud et humide. Les températures maxima du jour précédent, les minima et maxima du jour suivant furent :
| Date (Juillet 1952) | 19 | 20 | 26 | 27 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ville | max. | min. - max. | max. | min. - max. | ||
| Washington | 93 °F | 76 °F | 90 °F | 90 °F | 75 °F | 94 °F |
| Norfolk | 98 °F | 78 °F | 95 °F | 89 °F | 72 °F | 98 °F |
![]() |
La nuit du 19 au 20 une grande et plate zone de haute-pression de 1020 millibars fut située au-dessus de la Middle Mississippi Valley et a very minor trough existed off the east coast. There were no fronts in the immediate area of either Washington or Norfolk. The general flow of air was from west to east.
Dans la nuit du 26 au 27, Washington comme Norfolk étaient près du centre d'une flat high-pressure wedge s'étendant du Texas à plusieurs centaines de miles à l'Est de New York City. A light drift from south to north characterized the air flow outward from the central portion of the wedge. Again, there were no fronts in the immediate area of either station.
It would have been possible for observers on the ground to have seen small clouds at both low and middle heights at various times during each of the two nights. Some cloud cover - mostly scattered clouds - was recorded by nearly all the observing stations where trained observers were on duty. A summary of cloud cover conditions is as follows:
![]() |
![]() |
The conditions of the atmosphere were capable of generating anomalous propagation on weather radar displays on both nights. In Battan's book on RADAR METEOROLOGY, published in 1959, page 21, is found the following:
Nocturnal radiation, which occurs on clear nights, especially in the summer when the ground is moist, leads to a temperature inversion at the ground and a sharp decrease in moisture with height. It is found that these conditions frequently produce abnormal propagation, which becomes more pronounced as the temperature and humidity lapse rates become larger ... These conditions which favor ducts at the ground occur most frequently over large land areas in the summer and can be thought of as situations of "radiative superrefraction.
More recent studies of anomalous propagation on radar have been made at Texas A & M. They have further confirmed the appearance of radar echoes during night and early morning hours under clear sky conditions when low level inversions and fluctuating quantities of moisture characterize the surrounding atmosphere.
In Figures 1-4, profiles of temperature and dew point, plus wind direction and velocity, are presented. In most instances the vertical profiles near the ground would have had several degrees variation in and around each of the two stations where the radars were located. Using surface temperatures at the several airports and the actual radar sights, there would have been variations of from 3-5°F. in the first few hundred feet. Relatively small change in the vertical profiles would have occurred during the night at elevations greater than 2,500 feet. Respective percentages of relative humidity are recorded next to the moisture profile. The dashed lines report observations made at 10:00 P.M. The solid lines report values at 10:00 A.M. the following morning. The profiles would have changed gradually during the night-time hours but would have remained somewhere between these two soundings, The greatest variability in the local area would have been in the lowest few hundred feet. Near the surface, indications for 4:00 A.M. were made from surface observations.
![]() |
Of some importance is the fact that rain showers were reported in the Washington area during late afternoon on the 19th of July. Amounts reported at the three stations in the Washington area ranged from .10 through .13. This would have wet the ground and furnished a variable moisture source in different portions of the surrounding countryside.
It is the author's opinion that hot, humid air prevailed on both nights in both Washington and Norfolk. The general weather would have been considered fair weather by the trained observers at the various airports and they may not have reported all the scattered clouds which actually existed. It would have been considered an "easy shift." Visibilities remained above six miles at all times. The horizontal movement of scattered clouds, plus formation and dissipation of some few low clouds, both could have been seen at various times by ground observers whose eyes were well adjusted to the darkened sky. Anomalous propagation could have been observed on weather radar units during both nights at both locations. The echoes due to anomalous propagation would have had horizontal motion similar to the clouds.
LOREN W. CROW
Météorologue consultante certifiée
| Home > Rapport Condon > Sommaire |
|---|