Annexe "A" - Analyse des incidents d'objets volants aux U.S. et tactiques hypothétiques employées

(Top Secret) [puis déclassifié]

Home  >  Documents  >  Officiels  >  Etude #203
  1. Introduction. Formuler les tactiques possibles d'objets volants signalés au-dessus des U.S. suppose dès le début que des conclusions fermes ont été atteintes sur à la fois l'existence et l'origine des objets volants signalés. Le status actuel de l'information sur ces incidents et l'analyse globale ne permet pas la substantiation de telles conclusions. Cependant, l'absence de telles conclusions fermes pointe vers la nécessité d'une analyse statistique immédiate et saine de tout aspect de la situation et n'exclut pas un examen concurrent des incidents signalés pour développer des explications de leurs tactiques possibles. Ce dernier sera utile à une date future si l'existence et l'origine des objets volants devait être définitivement établie. Par conséquent, l'analyse qui suit des informations disponibles est avancée afin de présenter les preuves de l'existence effective d'un certain type d'objet volant et to relate same to tactical purposes for which the objects are possibly designed. The foll owing discussion must be considered a provisional analysis, pending a further detailed analysis of all aspects of the problem.

  2. Certains aspects concernant les incidents d'objet volant. A cursory examination of evidence on reported incidents has been made and it is possible to cite certain generalities which it appears may be borne out when detailed analyses have been completed.

    Among the incidents reported there are many statements by reliable and experienced persons which tend to confirm that flying objects have been seen. The description of such objects seems to fall roughly into three categories: (1) Silver disks or balls, approximating a Horten wing type aircraft; (2) Balls of fire of various colors and intensities; (3) Cigar or pencil-shaped objects similar in appearance to V-2 type rockets in horizontal flight. The numbers of configurations might be further reduced with the following considerations in mind: Silver disks or balls have, for the greater part, been observed in daylight and a number under clear weather conditions with visibility unlimited. In most instances, balls of fire have been observed at night. Cigar, or pencil-shaped objects have been sighted in fewer numbers but with about equal distribution in daylight and at night. A few accounts tell of the disks having a rough cigar-shape when viewed while maneuvering. Some of the disks are d escribed as having luminosity in daylight. It therefore is possible that a single type of object may be involved in all sightings, and differences in description may result from viewing the objects at various angles and under differing conditions of visibility.

    The above tends to indicate that some type object has been seen and the possibility exists that the object or objects seen are conventional domestic devices, such as weather balloons, test rockets, or jet-equipped aircraft with pancake or flying wing configurations.

    The possibility exists that the reporting of flying objects may have been influenced by earlier reports on similar incidents in Scandinavia and Central Europe. The publication in newspaper of details on such incidents, both foreign and domestic, may have induced some of the description provided in reported domestic incidents. However, one of the earliest reported sightings in the U.S. was the one observed by U.S. Weather Bureau personnel in Avril 1947, at Richmond (Virginie), and on the basis of this one report it appears that the disks are not balloons. It would seem that this sighting was not influenced by the reports of foreign incidents, the newspaper accounts of domestic incidents, nor by misidentification of a conventional object.

    Although reported domestic incidents are widely scattered throughout the U.S., frequency of sighting and number of observers per sighting assumes a definable pattern. There is a large concentration of sightings along the Eastern Seaboard; another large concentration throughout the Western Coast states, and a few sightings in the Middle West. Distribution of incidents by configuration of object and description of maneuverability is approximately equal in each of these areas and this is believed to further substantiate the possibility that one type of object might have been observed in different aspects of flight.

    If sightings are induced by rumor, it seems unusual that more incidents have not been reported from the areas with high concentration of population. Reports from such areas would also have greater facility in channeling either to newspaper or official reporting agencies. For the most part, sightings have been made in fairly open country where there are few restrictions to visibility, which may indicate that obstructed vision has reduced sightings in built-up areas.

    It therefore seems that some type of flying object has been observed; the identification of its origin requires the competion (sic) of other analyses.

  3. Origine possible des objets volants inhabituels. Etant donné, upon the completion of analyses, it is indicated that some or all of the reported flying objects over the U.S. sont d'origine étrangère, les objets pourraient d'un point de vue logique, être considéré comme soviétiques. Il est évident d'après les caractéristiques de performance attribuées aux objets non-identifiés at this time that if they are foreign, they involve efficiencies of performance which have not been realized in any operational airborne device in this country. It would, therefore, be a mistake to analyze the technical aspects of the situation within the limits of our own knowledge of practical developments. It is more desirable to consider then the outer limits of possible Soviet developments and objectives in attempting to formulate some idea of the tactics which might be involved.

    First of all, the scientific objectives of the URSS have been stated many times and indicated in many forms. The most clearcut statement of this objective is probably contained in the preamble to the Fourth Five-year Plan (1946-50) which states that the objective of Soviet science is to overtake and surpass the scientific and technical developments of the capitalist nations. It apparently would be an impossible task for the Soviet Union to accomplish such an objective by proceeding step-by-step along the same lines of development already achieved in the capitalist nations. This would mean that it would be necessary to rapidly proceed through each phase of aeronautical development that has already been accomplished in this country, and this probably would never have any prospects of accelerating Soviet development beyond any point reached by the U.S. The obvious answer to accomplish their objective of not only overtaking, but surpassing the capitalist countries would be a scient ific shortcut. This possibility is not so remote when examined on the basis of our knowledge of the current situation in the URSS. Provided Soviet emphasis was given to the most promising and advanced ideas acquired from Germany in 1945 and the work aided by German scientists, the possibility of catching up and possibly surpassing other nations in technical developments becomes more realistic. It becomes even more realistic if the Soviets have shown a tendency to concentrate on certain developments which have still not received a maximum of priority in our own programs.

    Il est connu que l'URSS a depuis 1945 enlisted the service of Dr. Guenther Bock, a German who headed all development of low aspect ratio (flying wing) type aircraft in Germany. Dr. Bock is believed to be the top German scientist in charge at TSAGI and TSIAM qui sont des organisations du type "Commandement du Matériel Aérien" en URSS. Further, it is believed that Dr. Bock has made available all German plans for flying wing type aircraft to the Soviets. Among the designs considered by the Germans and possibly exploited by the URSS, are jet-propelled, flying wing type aircraft whose configuration would be similar to descriptions of certain objects reported flying over the U.S. The estimated speeds of such aircraft are within range of the lower limits of speed attributed to flying objects over the U.S. It Is not impossible that emphasis on surpassing foreign developments has led to unusual progress in fuels and propulsion by the URSS. In connection with possible advancemen ts in the field of fuels and propulsion, it should be observed that the Russian oil situation (regardless of estimated oil reserves) is quite different from that in the U.S. For example, U.S. oil industry is prepared to turn out tremendous quantities of highly fractionated petroleum products, while the URSS. cannot reasonably approach such capabilities. This consideration dictates different solutions on fuels for propulsion in the two countries and in turn, dictates the direction taken in development of jet motors or the use of other propulsive devices. We must therefore, arrive at the conclusion that any Soviet device which may have made its appearance over the U.S. as described, would possess unusual performance characteristics which, in all probability, would include unusual range. The possibility that they could have been launched at fairly close range should not be discarded.

  4. Raisons ou tactiques possibles pour l'utilisation d'appareils soviétiques non conventionnels au-dessus des U.S. Predicated on all the foregoing assumptions, des appareils soviétiques non conventionnels pourraient avoir été envoyés voler au-dessus des U.S. pour l'une, toutes, ou une combinaison des raisons suivantes :

    1. Pour nier la confiance U.S. en la bombe atomique comme l'arme la plus avancée et la plus décisive. Si les objets ont été utilisé dans un sens de propagande, il serait raisonnable de supposer que les soviétiques choisiraient d'abord d'effrayer les nations pro-américaines en Europe avec l'apparence d'une arme radicalement nouvelle pour contrecarrer la capacité des U.S. à obtenir une pleine efficacité de propagande avec la bombe atomique. On se souviendra que les objets étranges sont d'abord apparus au-dessus des pays scandinaves en 1946. Les objets observés à cet endroit avaient des caractéristiques inhabituelles de portée et de performance. Alors que cette démonstration au-dessus des pays scandinaves avait lieu, les U.S. menaient une campagne vigoureuse pour l'alignement économique et politique de ces nations avec d'autres nations occidentales pro-américaines. Lorsque ces incidents diminuèrent, des objets volants étranges commençèrent à être observés à un rythme croissant au-desus des U.S. La conclusion sur ce point est que les objets volants pourraient avoir été utilisés pour effrayer à la fois les nations européennes et les U.S. avec l'apparence d'un nouvel appareil, and that failure to identify such a Soviet object would give them invaluable indication that U.S. development is far behind that of the Soviets. Except for this indication, it is believed that the use of the objects to promote fear has been worthless in that the U.S. public has tended to characterize these incidents entirely as hallucinations by "crack pots", misidentification of conventional objects, or that they represent a secret American project which should not be publicized. Any fear that might result from Soviet use will come only by a discovery that the objects have been Soviet aircraft and that they involve radical developments which are in advance of our own accomplishments.

    2. Pour la reconnaissance photographique. Il est possible que les soviétiques ont employé les objets volants pour la collecte de renseignement photographique ou la cartographie de certaines régions des U.S. L'action evasive employée par tous les objets observés indique pas tant une tentative d'éviter d'être vu, qu'une tentative d'éviter la révélation du type exact d'appareil volant et de sa mission. Les observations d'objets au-dessus des U.S. ont été plus intenses dans les états côtiers de l'est et de l'ouest. De plus, des observations d'objets volants ont été faites près de Oak Ridge, dans le Tennessee, Las Cruces, au Nouveau Mexique, et dans la région générale des Hanford Works dans l'Oregon. Généralement, des observations n'ont pas été faites au-dessus de ce que nous considérons comme des zones industrielles stratégiques. La raison à cela pourrait être soit que les objets volants n'ont été observés qu'en route vers ou de retour de missions au-dessus de ces zones stratégiques concentrées, ou que les soviétiques ont obtenu suffisamment d'informations durant leur liaison de la 2nde guerre mondiale avec l'industrie U.S. pour satisfaire leurs besoins en renseignement et ont un besoin plus actif d'information sur les industries et zones qui ne leur étaient pas accessibles pendant les contacts de la 2nde guerre mondiale. Ceci est intéressant relativement aux observations près de Oak Ridge, Las Cruces et dans la région générale des Hanford Works puisque ces établissements n'étaient pas, et ne sont pas, accessibles aux collecteurs soviétiques de renseignement photographique.

    3. Test des défenses U. S.. Il est possible que l'utilisation d'objets volants soviétiques au-dessus des U.S. n'ait pour but que de déterminer la capacité des défenses U.S. à repérer un appareil étranger. Cela serait d'une importance extrême pour l'URSS dans l'éventualité où une attaque one-way all-out de bombardiers stratégiques soviétiques serait prévue. La capacité à opérer au-dessus des U.S. uninhibited at a time when the U.S. is supposedly re-arming and putting great stress on defenses would provide valuable information on which to base estimates for probability of success in bombing strategic objectives in the U. S.

    4. Familiarisation de vols au-dessus du territoire U.S.. Cette raison possible est peut-être la plus improbable. Il est supposé que, si ce but devait être impliqué, d'autres objectifs sont probablement aussi accomplis dans son exécution. Etant donné que l'URSS a des appareils d'une performance inhabituellement élevée ils pourraient trouver avantageux de se familiariser avec la topographie des U.S. en anticipation de missions de combat futures vers des cibles stratégiques.

  5. Conclusion. La conclusion qu'un certain type d'objet volant a été observé au-dessus des U.S. semble être étayée. Il n'est pas connu à l'heure actuelle si ces observations sont des méprises d'appareils domestiques lancés, de phénomènes naturels ou d'appareils étrangers non-conventionnels. Il est, par conséquent, impossible de fournir une quelconque explication fiable à leur apparition au-dessus des U.S. ou des tactiques qu'ils pourraient employer si les objets observés incluent de quelconques développements dans les domaines aéronautiques. Il est de la même manière impossible à l'heure actuelle de contenir des discussions sur les caractéristiques de performance ou les tactiques possibles dans les limites du sens commun, if for no other reason than the fact that proof of the existence of a foreign development of this type would necessarily introduce considerations of new principals and means not yet considered practical possibilities in our own research and development.
Home  >  Documents  >  Officiels  >  Etude #203